AI implementation
Practical business-grade AI features built around your data and your processes — intelligent assistants, knowledge bases, custom Claude/GPT deployments, RAG and fine-tuning.

32 years of Transmedia training expertise, joined with our consultant sister company based in Berlin who ships production AI, automation, and bespoke systems for enterprise. One team, two countries, one accountable engagement.
Start a conversationThe partnership
For three decades Transmedia has trained the people who actually use these tools. Now, through our consultant sister company based in Berlin, we extend the same depth into delivery — across two countries, one accountable engagement.
The London team owns scope, language, and outcomes. The Berlin team owns architecture, code, and production. You speak to people who understand both sides of the table — the user who will press the buttons, and the engineer who will build them.
Engagements are quoted in five days, scoped tightly, and led by senior practitioners. There are no juniors, no offshoring chains, and no "solutions architects" whose job is to slow the meeting down.
32 years
Training the field
150,000+
Practitioners trained
180+
Tools covered
What we do
Most engagements span two or three of these. We deliberately keep the practices joined up so the brief stays with one team — discovery, design, build and the training that goes with it.
Practical business-grade AI features built around your data and your processes — intelligent assistants, knowledge bases, custom Claude/GPT deployments, RAG and fine-tuning.
Connect the stack so leads, contacts, campaigns and reporting run themselves — Google Ads, GA4, CRM and email joined up end-to-end with attribution that adds up.
Audit how work moves through your team and replace the slow steps with software — process mapping, automated approvals, audit-friendly logging, before-and-after measurement.
Bespoke applications for problems off-the-shelf software does not solve — Next.js, React, Node and Python web apps, mobile, e-commerce, performance and accessibility built in.
Make the systems you already pay for talk to each other properly — CRM, ERP, accounting, HR, marketing stacks, bespoke APIs, single sign-on, role-based access.
A team that stays around once the project ships — monitoring, alerting, defined response window, monthly review, iteration as the business changes, optional training top-ups.
How we work
The same four-step pattern we use on the 90-day training programme — adapted for software delivery. Fixed dates, working software at every step, and a planned exit.
A working session with the people who own the problem. We map what happens today, what the constraints are, and what good looks like. You leave with a written brief whether you go ahead or not.
A fixed-scope, fixed-price proposal within five working days. Architecture, user flows, the integration plan and the delivery timeline — all on one document you can take to procurement.
Senior engineers only. Weekly demos of working software, never slide decks. Your team is involved from week one, including the people who will run it after we leave.
Documentation, runbooks and a trained internal champion on day one of go-live. Thirty days of hyper-care support included. After that, an ongoing arrangement only if you want one.
Why us
On paper, this is an odd combination. In practice, it is the reason the engagements work. We have to understand the tools and the people who use them well enough to teach them. That happens to be the same understanding you need to build software that actually gets used.
If we trained your designers, your marketers or your analysts, we already understand what they can pick up and where they will need support. The build is shaped around the people who will use it, not abstract personas.
Our default is to teach you to run what we build. Sessions for the internal champion, documentation written for humans, and a clean exit. We are happy to stay around, but we never have to.
We do not resell SaaS or take referral fees. The recommendations you get are the ones we would make for our own work, and the code is yours from the first commit.
The people who quote the work are the people who deliver it. No junior bench, no agency-style account layer, no being passed between teams halfway through.
How we engage
We do not publish day rates because the meaningful number is the project price, and that depends on the scope. The pattern, however, is the same on every engagement.
45 minutes with the senior engineer or strategist who would lead the work. You leave with a written brief either way.
Within five working days. Architecture, plan, timeline and price. No procurement gymnastics, no creeping change orders later.
Paid in stages tied to working software, not hours logged. Most projects run six to twelve weeks; larger programmes three to six months.
Monthly retainer for monitoring, iteration and training top-ups. Only entered after a delivery so both sides know the working relationship.
A recent engagement
A non-profit running a global education network needed to consolidate four separate websites, a learning platform and a donor system into one estate the small in-house team could maintain.
Two-week discovery, six-week design and build, two-week handover. Migration of 8,000 historic content items, new admin tooling for the in-house editors, and a four-day train-the-trainer programme so the team could keep shipping after the engagement closed.
Single estate live on schedule. Editor time per content update down from roughly forty minutes to under five. Eighteen months on, the in-house team is still running the platform without external development support.
45 minutes with a senior engineer, no charge. You leave with a written brief whether we go ahead or not.
Book a discovery call